The town meeting got off pretty much on time. The quorum was close, but we made it (I still would prefer a zero quorum).
The first couple articles quickly were deferred until June. One was about changing the “envelope” around the APR property Mrs Ogonowski lives within.. the other about the town taking over two sewer lift stations.
The Budget item passed easily. It was mostly a reorganizing of some items, and adjusting the revenue figures to meet the actuals we’ve seen so far. (and the GLTech finally got their cash.. lol). At times I wish we could just “call the question” rather than hear all the details, but then again I would complain if I didn’t hear them.
The contentious article turned out not to be Louisburg (which was basically moot, so it was voted on just to get it over with), but the raising of sewer tie-in fees.
Finance Chair Gary Marsella came out saying that homeowner’s sewer rates were “in peril” if this wasn’t passed.
Bill Morin then spoke in favor of the bill, saying that he had had the sewer commission before the “Government Rules and Regulations” committee to explain this to them. In my mind, I was thinking “is that their role? I thought their position was to review the legality of the wording of new bylaws .. not rule on a recommendation of the content.”
Then the fireworks started (other than the microphone feedback problems).
Selectman Jim O’Loughlin came forward speaking to the need. Nobody had come to the selectmen saying why they needed more money, only that “other towns had done it, so why don’t we.” Tewksbury and Chelmsford, he pointed out, were not an example of the direction he wanted Dracut to go in.
He challenged Marsella on using the “in peril” line as a scare tactic. He didn’t believe sewer fees would be raised while the town studied the issue for a few months first. Nobody showed that the sewer commission needed additional money, only that they had found a way to get more.. at the cost of new home buyers and new businesses.
The rest of the Board of Selectmen had agreed with O’Loughlin, except- of course, John Zimini.
Zimini came out and immediately started mocking O’Loughlin’s statements, and made a great old fashioned Democrat pledge to support the “homeowners” and people on “fixed incomes”.
In my mind, once again, I was thinking that he was supposed to be the selectmen in support of bringing new businesses to town. An additional $2500 per unit on larger businesses such as those on 113 could cost a new business another quarter to half million dollars. When comparing locations between towns like Dracut, Tewksbury , etc.. its nice to be on the low side of fees and taxes to be competitive.
The town meeting voted not to defer, but to vote on the article, and then quickly voted to pass it (I belive on the belief that it was saving their sewer fees from increasing). I think this was at a cost to the town of future businesses, but like Obama’s “jobs created or saved”.. that just can’t be measured.
Something may have gone on in the Selectmen’s meeting before the town meeting, I’m not sure (I was over at the Salvation Army meeting). But Zimini did not just come out to speak.. he came out angry again. It seems to be his common theme lately.
It almost feels like we’ve got two people running against each other for office here.. with Zimini building his support structure throughout the town committees, while O’Loughlin is using conservative values to build a support base among the general populace.
PS. Props to Selectman Bob Cox for taking his stand on the Louisburg Vote, and then leading the applause for the woman who lives at the building who spoke to the disgust she felt towards the people who spoke as if she lived in a tenement. She loves her home, and feels that the whole Louisburg argument come down against the seniors in town and the opponents should feel ashamed of themselves.