I attended another Senate debate again last night. The big story of the night, of course, was that Finegold chose not to attend (he backed out over the weekend I understand because of “other commitments” that came up).
The Debate, hosted by WCAP radio, was held at a great function location in Lawrence that I had never been to before. Salvatore’s had an excellent riverside function room that was great for this event. I hope we see more events at this location in the future.
The debate included questions from the audience, as well as formal questions from the press (Lowell Sun, Valley Patriot, and 980 WCAP).
Moderated by Charlie Lyons of the Shawsheen Tech, he did not require the candidates to answer the questions.. which was disappointing, but only controlled the time. 30 seconds for a question, 90 seconds for a response.
I asked each of the candidates to send a copy of their closing statements, and instead I have already received both opening and closing statements from three of the candidates (many having the exact same filenames!) I include links to them in the following paragraphs.
The Republicans: Rahilly vs Tomasek
Jamison Tomasek finally came out a little more aggresively, going after Patrick Rahilly.. and Rahilly wasn’t prepared for it.
He went after the experience angle.. “I have the maturity, experience, and I’m a homeowner,” he said. “I’m more connected with selectmen and city councillors from both sides of the district.”
I had to give it to him.. he did it well.
Rahilly kept his focus on cutting taxes, and supporting local aid, safety and education.
Tomasek was prepared for that though, saying “I didn’t get into this race to cut taxes, but to improve life in the district.”
And when Rahilly was given the opportunity to question Tomasek directly, he made the mistake of feeding Tomasek questions the allowed him to talk to his strengths: 40b, the endorsements, etc.
They both had similar opinions re: Lawrence, taxes, spending.. but in this one, Tomasek sounded a little more practiced and prepared.
They both spoke to the importance of supporting children in the district, Rahilly emphasizing the need for summer jobs programs, and Tomasek talking to the importance of the social services and state programs that touch kids.
And the Democrats:
Barry Finegold?
And that was the point of the night in this debate. Finegold did not show, and they both took it out on his empty chair.
In her final question to Jack Wilson, Deb Silberstein actually asked “Do you know where Barry is?”
On tax cuts, Silberstein talks of supporting a small cut in the income tax, and both support the elimination of the alcohol tax on a tax.
Wilson does not prefer the cut to 3% sales tax, but vows to support it if its voted in.
They each have differing views on where they would focus their efforts, Silberstein taking a more leftist view of subjects like immigration and taxation, and Wilson pushing for a more centrist “anti establishment” candidacy.
Both were very negative towards Finegold.
“I find his not attending tonight to be offensive, arrogant and a disgrace,” Silberstein said.
“Its a slap in the face to the voters of the district,” Wilson followed. “Finegold has decided to sit it out rather than be here to defend his record.”
All the questions to each other really became hits on Finegold.. and the audience ate it up.
I have to say, many in the audience were talking very positively about Wilson after this debate. Yet I did feel that Silberstein held her own, playing to her experience working in various positions in Andover.
I encourage the readers to go to each of the candidates websites (listed on my front page) to see their specific views and policy statements.
A video of the event will hopefully be available soon, and I’m hoping the radio station may decide to rebroadcast over the weekend.
Tags: Fall 2010 Election











